and it is generally laid down in the English books that whatever will make a man an accessory in felony will make him a principal in treason: "It is well known," says FOSTER, " that in the ...

For all its defects of writing, this book should be set beside Ralph de Toledano’s account of the Hiss case, Humphrey Slater’s Conspirator, and Rebecca West’s The Meaning of Treason.

Did the superintendent of West Point either read the book and agreed with it was ok to go to the sacred space of West Point to talk about his treason and his coup?